Development News for Stow, Ohio

Pool Enclosure Violation Upheld; Compliance Deadline Set for Progress Park Drive Property

The hearing for violation V2641-2691 at 2691 Progress Park Drive, concerning a pool without an enclosure, was reconvened. The property owner, Mr. Dillinger, presented arguments that his pool cover was a safer and more effective enclosure than a traditional fence. The planning department, represented by Director Zack Cowan, and Councilmember Kyle Feldman were present. The hearing officer reviewed past similar violations and determined that the pool cover did not meet the city's definition of an enclosure, which requires three walls and a ceiling. Despite acknowledging the safety of the cover, the hearing officer ruled the property to be in violation of the code. Mr. Dillinger was given until July 1st to provide evidence of progress towards installing a fence, such as a quote or material purchase, to avoid fines. The hearing officer indicated a willingness to work with the property owner and potentially grant extensions. The possibility of amending the city code to grandfather in existing compliant alternatives was discussed, with Councilmember Feldman expressing interest in pursuing this, though the timeline for such an amendment would likely extend past Mr. Dillinger's compliance deadline.