Development News for Hoover, Alabama

Paramedical Tattoo Practice Approved at Montgomery Highway Salon

A conditional use request for Opelux, a paramedical tattoo practice, was reviewed for operation in a booth within a salon at 1713 Montgomery Highway, Suite 109. The property is zoned C2 and located in a shopping center. Staff recommended approval with three conditions: the business must only engage in paramedical tattooing (replicating natural skin tones and features), a certificate of occupancy and business license must be obtained prior to operation, and the conditional use must not be transferable to another business owner or location. The commission approved the request subject to these conditions.

Everly Phase 4C Lot Line Reconfiguration Approved

The commission considered Everly phase 4C reservey number one, a PUD/PR1 zoned property on Terara Street in Everly. The plat's purpose was to reconfigure interior lot lines between lots 5715, 5716, and 5717. Staff recommended approval. The commission approved the request.

A2 Church Expansion Approved with Conditions

The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed revised site plans for an addition to A2 Church, located at 6 Green Hill Parkway. The church, which previously shared the property with a nursery, sought approval for an expansion of its existing building. Staff recommended approval with three conditions: inclusion of photometrics in the lighting plan, development in substantial conformity with the conditional use plan, and obtaining a revised certificate of occupancy upon completion. Stormwater documentation will also be required at the time of permitting. The commission approved the request with the stipulated conditions.

Storm Sewer Easement Revisions for Ross Bridge Lot Continued

A reservey of lot 165C of Ross Bridge, located at 1798 Glascott Trail, was presented for review to revise two storm sewer easements. One proposed revision involved reducing the width of an easement due to a constructed retaining wall, while the other aimed to correct an easement that did not align with the physical location of the storm sewer pipe. Staff recommended a continuance due to issues with both easements, specifically regarding the adequacy of the revised easement width for maintenance and the misalignment of the pipe and easement. Concerns were raised about the pipe being plastic and potentially outside the platted easement, and a swimming pool encroaching on a proposed easement area. The commission continued the case to allow the applicant and staff to resolve these issues.